This zone is
characterised by
long growing
season and
winter rainfall
(450-600mm) with
a mix of annual
grasses, perennial
rye-grasses and
sub
clover and
a total pasture
production of
6-8t/ha.
Typically these
enterprises have
30-50% crop.
|
|
The growing season and
high production affects
the potential stocking rate
and pasture utilisation and
therefore affects the
recommendations for ewe
management.
Late
winter-spring
lambing
provides
the best
match of
pasture
availability
to the
energy
needs of
the ewe
and
lamb.
This
match
can
allow
more
sheep to
be run
relative
to
lambing
at other
times of
the
year.
The economic analysis that
supports these
recommendations is generated
using the Wagga
Wagga MIDAS
model. Download
the full
report of the
modelling for this
region (250kB PDF).
The
optimum
profile
for
spring
lambing
flocks
in
the Southern
Slopes
of
NSW
and
central
Victoria
is:
-
moderate loss of
condition from
joining to
'break of
season',
provided the
condition can be
regained prior
to lambing on
green feed
-
aim for
Condition Score
2.6 -3.0 at
joining
The
most
important
target for
ewe flocks
is to regain
condition
lost in
early
pregnancy before
lambing
commences.
Meeting this
target gives
the optimum
profitability.
An
alternative
option is to
start at a
higher
condition
score, lose
0.6 of a
condition
score and
re-gain at
least 0.3 of
the
condition
lost by
lambing.
There
is a
trade-off
between
the
saving
on
feed
in
early
pregnancy
(lose
more
condition)
and
loss
of
production,
particularly
lamb
survival
and
ewe
wool
production.
As
ewe
condition
approaches
CS 2
both
her
and
her
lambs
survival
will
be
compromised.
Any
breeding
ewe
be
no
lower
than
score
2
for
this
reason.
In
late
pregnancy
green
feed
must
be
used
to
gain
condition
as
supplementary
feed
costs
are
too
high
to
offset
any
gains
in
production.
Ewes
require
1200
FOO
(900
HM) by
lambing
for
single
ewes
and
1800
FOO
(1400
HM) for
twinning
ewes
to
regain
lost
condition.
If
this
amount
of
green
feed
isn't
likely
to
be
available
then
the
next
best
approach
is
to
lose
less
condition
or
maintain
ewe
condition
throughout
pregnancy.
Establishing
pastures
should
be
deferred
so
that
FOO
targets
can
be
reached.
The
greatest
value
of
supplementary
feed
is
maintaining
the
ewe
while
pastures
are
being
deferred
to
allow
good
pastures
for
lambing.
Key
points:
-
Incre
asing
ewe
condition
should
only
be
done
using
green
feed.
It
is
rarely
economic
to
feed
grain to
increase condition
-
Only
lose
enough
condition
over
autumn
that can
be
regained
using
green
feed
after
the
break. Defer
pastures
to
achieve
this
level of
feed.
-
If
ewes
are,
by
reason
of
a
good
summer,
on
a
higher
starting
CS,
continue
to
follow
the
shape
of
the
higher
profiles
rather
than
lose
more
condition
to
start
on
the
lower
profile.
This
will
still
give a
high economic
return.
Profitability
of
following
the
optimum
pro
f
ile
Following
the optimum
profile of
joining at
CS 2.6,
losing 0.3
of a
condition
score in
early
pregnancy
until the
break of
season and
regaining
all lost
condition on
green feed
gives the
highest
profitability
for this
region and
system of
$33.30/ewe
(figure 2,
profile 3).
Maintaining
ewes at
their
joining
condition
throughout
the whole of
pregnancy is
expensive,
approximately
$3.70/ewe
compared to
losing and
regaining
condition at
CS 2.6 due
to the extra
hand feed
over autumn
and not
taking
advantage of
the rapidly
growing feed
in
spring(figure
2, profile
2).
Maintaining
at a higher
condition
score such
as CS 3
throughout
pregnancy is
-$6.80 less
profitable
than losing
and
regaining at
CS 2.6
(profile
1.).
Figure 2 .
Although profile
4 (losing 0.3 CS
and failing to
regain that
condition) has
the same
profitability
as
maintaining
condition
throughout (
-$3.20 per ewe),
it has the
important
downside of 1.5
times the lamb
mortality and
double the ewe
mortality making
this profile not
recommended
(profile 4
).
Following the
optimum profile
(regaining the lost
condition prior to
lambing) requires
more energy just
after the break of
the season but
results in higher
progeny fleece
values and higher
progeny survival. In
this case the
reduction in progeny
production for the
ewes that lose more
condition in early
pregnancy outweighs
the saving in energy
requirement and
results in a benefit
from meeting the
target condition
scores at all
stocking rates
(profile 3) and
there is little
difference in the
optimum stocking
rate regardless of
the timing of
regaining the
condition.
Trade-offs of risk for
profit
The late
lambing
optimum
profile
shown in
Figure
1. takes
into
account
both
profitability
and the
health
of the
breeding
flock
.
Ewe
mortality
generally
increases
with
lower
ewe
condition
by
lambing
(there
are
other
factors
such
as
weather,
age and
available
feed).
Ewe
condition
in late
pregnancy
has a
large
impact
on lamb
birth
weight
and
therefore
lamb
survival.
There is
a
compensatory
gain
effect
on lamb
birthweight
when
ewes
that
have
lost
condition
regain
it in
late
pregnancy.
Twin
lambs
are more
sensitive
to this
change
in birth
weight
(&
survival)
as their
birthweight
is
usually
further from
the optimum.
Table 1
shows
the
effect
of
several
profiles
on both
lamb and
ewe
survival
.
Following
a
profile
that
loses
more
condition
over
autumn
(0.6 CS)
and only
re-gains
half of
it by
lambing
has
similar
profitability
to that
of the
optimum
profile,
however,
there
are
large
penalties
in ewe
and lamb
survival.
Ewe
mortality
doubles
and the
survival
of twin
lambs is
10%
lower
than the
optimum
(67%
compared
to 77%).
It is
also a
high
risk
option
in that
if the
season
fails to
break
and ewes
don't
regain
that
small
amount
the
lambing
results
could be
disastrous,
with 14%
lower
twin
survival
and
further
ewe
losses
.
Table 1.
Difference
in
survival
of ewes
and
lambs
for late
lambing
flocks
compared
to
maintaining
condition
score
3.0
throughout
pregnancy
Condition
score
|
Survival
%
|
joining
|
Day
90
|
lambing
|
singles
|
twins
|
Ewes
|
2.6
|
2.3
|
2.6
|
-2.6
|
-0.6
|
-0.5
|
2.6
|
2.0
|
2.3
|
-5.2
|
-5.9
|
-1.4
|
2.6
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
-9.4
|
-14.2
|
-2.6
|
3.0
|
2.7
|
3.0
|
1.0
|
6.3
|
0.1
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Running
stock to
a higher
profile
such as
starting
in CS 3
at
joining
and
losing
0.3 by
the
break
and
re-gaining
all lost
condition
by
lambing
has a
slightly
lower
profitability
(-$2.30/ewe)
but if
there is
a more
severe
climate
or
irregular
seasons
this may
be the
best
option.
This
profile
gives an
increase
in lamb
and ewe
survival
compared
to
maintaining
at
condition
score 3
throughout
pregnancy
but
there
are
small
costs
associated
with
having
the ewes
in a
higher
condition
at joini
ng.
The
Condition
Score
profile is
for the
average
of the
flock.
Usually in
each flock
there will
be some
individuals
at least 0.5
of a
condition
score lower
(and an
equal
proportion
that are 0.5
of a
condition
score
higher).
Individual
ewes should
not be below
CS 2. Ewes
at or below
CS 2 during
pregnancy
should have
preferential
treatment to
regain
condition
prior to
lambing as
ewe (as well
as lamb)
mortality
increases
dramatically
when ewes
are below CS
2.
If
the
regain
in
condition
by
lambing
isn't
made and
the ewes
continue
to lose
condition
in late
pregnancy
to near
CS 2,
large
penalties
from ewe
and lamb
mortality
will be
incurred.
Even
maintaining
condition
in late
pregnancy
after
losing
condition
in early
pregnancy
will
have an
impact
on lamb
survival,
particularly
with
twin
lambs.
Any
individuals
in the
mob at
or below
CS2 will
be at
higher
risk
.
Runni
ng
lower
Stocking
Rates
T
hese
profiles
are
also
suitable
for
flocks
run
at
stocking
rates
lower
than
the
optimum.
However,
following
the
lifetimewool
ewe
profile
can
allow
you
to
increase
stocking
rates
safely
and
thereby
increasing
profitabilty.
In years
that
ewes'
peak
condition
prior to
joining
is above
the
optimum,
it is
worthwhile
following
the
higher
profile
as
described
in
Figure 1
(ie.
joining
in CS 3,
losing
to CS
2.7 and
regaining
to CS 3
by
lambing)
for that
season
because
extra
productivity
will
result.
Continuing
to
run
ewes
at
this
higher
flock
condition
score
will
give
a
slightly
lower
profitability
to
runninng
ewes
at
the
optimum
profile,
as
the
most
of
higher
cost
of
supplementation
is
offset
by
the
higher
production
gains.
Aiming
to
be
on
this
profile
every
year
or
in
an
average
year
will
be
more
expensive
as
it
takes
more
supplement
to
grow
maiden
ewes
to
the
higher
starting
condition
score
.
Download
a copy of the Ewe Managment
handbook for this region
(1.5 Mb pdf)
 Request
a copy of the Ewe
Management Handbook for this
region
View the
complete MIDAS
modelling report for
this region or view the summary
of the report
(economics section)
Tools
including
Pasture photos,
condition
scoring and feed
budgeting
Improving
ewe fleece weight and
wool quality Ewes
in better condition at
joining conceive more
lambs Improving
lamb survival More
productive lambs through
better ewe
management Managing
twinning ewes for higher
production Managing
ewe mortality Feed
Budgeting
For more information on
lifetimewool please
contact;
southern sheep zone: Phil
Graham, DPI NSW,
Yass.
northern sheep zone: Sue
Hatcher, DPI NSW,
Orange
NSW lifetimewool
newsletters
(to be added to the
mailing list please email Sue
Hatcher)
January
2005
April
2005
July
2005
October
2005
January
2006
April
2006
October
2006
April
2007
July
2007
October
2007
NSW DPI
Primefacts
Maiden
Merino ewe Conception
Rates How
responsive is the
conception rate of your
Merino ewes?
Fat
score of ewes at
joining: the benefits of
optimal nutrition
|